模板:Literal translation
直譯：
.svg){kind=link}
This template uses single quotation marks ('…'), because Wikipedia's Manual of Style at MOS:SINGLE calls for simple glosses to be enclosed this way.
用法[編輯]
{{literal translation}}→ 直譯：{{literal translation|lk=yes}}→ 直譯：{{literal translation|lk=no}}→ 直譯：{{literal translation|a}}→ 直譯：「a」{{literal translation|''a'' A}}→ 直譯：「a A」{{literal translation|a|b}}→ 直譯：「a」或「b」{{literal translation|a|b|c|d}}→ 直譯：「a」或「b」或「c」或「d」
For now, the template takes up to four separate translations (|a|b|c|d). If each meaning is a single word, using serial commas is another stylistic choice: |a, b, c, d.
Unlinking (|lk=no) avoids cluttering the same paragraph or list with repetitive overlinking of "直譯：".
<templatedata>
{
"params": {
"1": {
"label": "Literal meaning",
"description": "Gloss for a term",
"type": "string",
"required": true
},
"2": {
"label": "2nd literal meaning",
"description": "Another meaning, if any",
"type": "string"
},
"3": {
"label": "3rd literal meaning",
"description": "Another meaning, if any",
"type": "string"
},
"4": {
"label": "4th literal meaning",
"description": "Another meaning (last possible), if any",
"type": "string"
},
"sortable": {
"label": "Sortable",
"type": "string",
"description": "In sortable tables, ignore 'lit.'"
},
"i": {
"label": "Italic",
"description": "If 'yes', the prefix 'lit.' is italicized. The meaning is still not italicized. Italics of either is almost never necessary stylistically.",
"type": "string"
},
"lk": {
"label": "Link",
"type": "string",
"description": "If 'yes' or 'on', linked to the article on literal translation. If 'no' or 'off', no links or dashed underlines."
}
},
"description": "Formats the literal translation of a word or phrase per Manual of Style guidelines."
}
</templatedata>
重定向[編輯]
Any of the following can be used instead of {{literal translation}}, with the same parameters and results:
參見[編輯]
{{Gloss}}- similar template but without "lit." lead-in.