编辑“︁Corporate Memphis”︁（章节）

== 評價與應用 ==
Facebook採用此風格後，向量插畫的迅速普及引發批評反彈<ref name=":3"/>。該風格在專業與大眾層面（包括大量[[網路迷因]]）均遭批評為過度極簡、通用化<ref>{{Cite web|last=Quito|first=Anne|date=2019-10-26|title=Why editorial illustrations look so similar these days|url=https://qz.com/quartzy/1728767/why-editorial-illustrations-look-so-similar-these-days/|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210208044929/https://qz.com/quartzy/1728767/why-editorial-illustrations-look-so-similar-these-days/|archive-date=2021-02-08|access-date=2021-02-10|website=Quartz|language=en}}</ref>、敷衍<ref name=":2"/>、濫用，並試圖以{{le|人際互動|human interaction}}的[[烏托邦]]式樂觀形象改善大型科技公司的公眾觀感<ref name=":1">{{Cite web|last=Hawley|first=Rachel|date=2019-08-21|title=Don't Worry, These Gangly-armed Cartoons Are Here to Protect You From Big Tech|url=https://eyeondesign.aiga.org/dont-worry-these-gangley-armed-cartoons-are-here-to-protect-you-from-big-tech/|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210822143019/https://eyeondesign.aiga.org/dont-worry-these-gangley-armed-cartoons-are-here-to-protect-you-from-big-tech/|archive-date=2021-08-22|access-date=2021-02-10|website=Eye on Design|language=en-US}}</ref>。

插畫家Julien Posture則認為，對此風格的批評反映了創意產業在[[資本主義]]與[[新自由主義]]之下的更廣泛焦慮<ref name=":0"/>。另一些評論者則主張，Corporate Memphis應與其使用企業分開評價<ref name=":3" />。

在《[[環球郵報]]》中，Jen Gerson於評論2023年[[加拿大護照]]新設計時，將其比擬為Corporate Memphis風格<ref>{{Cite news |last=Gerson |first=Jen |date=2023-05-12 |title=Opinion: Yes, Canada's new passport really is that bad |url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-yes-canadas-new-passport-really-is-that-bad/ |access-date=2025-04-01 |work=[[The Globe and Mail]] |language=en-CA |archive-url=https://archive.today/20230515213459/https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-yes-canadas-new-passport-really-is-that-bad/ |archive-date=2023-05-15 |url-status=live |url-access=subscription}}</ref>。