imported>CYCcc：/* 相机传感器评比 */

2024-01-01T12:17:58Z

相机传感器评比

新页面

''' DxOMark '''，现在称为 '''DXOMARK'''，是一个「评估[[智能手机]]、[[镜头]]与[[相机]]」的[[商业]]评测网站。于2008年成立，最初是由[[法国]]一家工程咨询公司[[DxO]] Labs 旗下的DxOMark Image Labs SAS所拥有，总部位于法国[[巴黎]]的[[布洛涅-比揚古]]。DXOMARK Image Labs 于 2017 年 9 月分拆自 DxO Labs，并于 2019 年更名为 DXOMARK <ref>{{Cite web|url=http://smartchimps.com/smart-news/dxomark-unveils-expanded-mobile-benchmark-suite/|title=DxOMark unveils expanded mobile benchmark suite|website=smartchimps.com|language=en-US|access-date=2017-10-10|archive-date=2017-10-10|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171010155228/http://smartchimps.com/smart-news/dxomark-unveils-expanded-mobile-benchmark-suite/|dead-url=no}}</ref>。

许多独立的新闻刊物和专业媒体网站都会引用DXOMARK的分数，包括：《[[华盛顿邮报]]》、《[[纽约时报]]》、《[[时代周刊]]》、《[[世界报]]》、《[[Les Numeriques]]》、《[[新德里电视台]]》、《[[今日印度]]》、《[[印度快报]]》、《[[中国日报]]》、《[[富比士]]》、《[[连线]]》、《[[ZDNet]]》、《[[Extreme Tech]]》、《[[Tech Crunch]]》、《[[TechRadar]]》、《[[CNET]]》、《[[个人电脑世界]]》、《[[Gizmodo]]》、《[[Engadget]]》、《[[Digital Trends]]》、《[[The Next Web]]》、《[[The Verge]]》、《[[GSM Arena]]》、《[[Android Authority]]》、《[[Mac Rumors]]》、《[[Digital Photography Review]]》、《[[Shutterbug]]》、《[[Imaging Resource]]》、《[[Trusted Reviews]]》、《[[T3]]》、《[[XDA-Developers]]》、《[[第一邮报]]》、《[[Xataka]]》、《[[PetaPixel]]》、《[[Tom's Guide]]》、《[[BGR]]》、《[[新浪]]》以及《[[搜狐]]》。

== DXOMARK评测系统 ==
DXOMARK的测试分数是在商业保密下以全面且大量测试记录的方式所取得。总体得分是汇整自多项具体并详细的测试属性而来，但无从得知这些[[属性]]的实际[[权重]] 。DXOMARK强调：「总分并不是各项子分数的加总。它是以专有且机密的方式将子分数反应在整体的分数上。」DXOMARK也强调他们会为设备制造商提供咨询服务，以协助制造商生产出更好的[[相机]]。

关于具体的分数，尚不清楚DXOMARK评分系统的分数上限为何；早期一些优异的机种可能得到的最高分数为100分，但后来表现出色的机种可获得的分数则超过了100分。还有很重要的一点是，DXOMARK的分数并不是取自任何测试项目的平均值。

== 相机传感器评比 ==
DXOMARK的传感器分数是评测数张由相机传感器<ref name=DxOMark-Cameras>{{Cite web|url=https://www.DxOMark.com/Cameras/|title=Sensors Database – DxOMark|website=www.DxOMark.com|publisher=DxOMark|date=|accessdate=13 October 2020|archive-date=2020-11-15|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201115083617/https://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/|dead-url=no}}</ref>所拍摄的[[RAW]]图像质量所得而来<ref name=DPReview-LRE>{{Cite web|url=https://www.DPReview.com/articles/3135549652/lens-reviews-explained/8|title=Lens reviews explained|website=www.DPReview.com|publisher=[[Digital Photography Review]]|date=30 October 2012|access-date=12 November 2020|archive-date=2020-10-18|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201018040911/https://www.dpreview.com/articles/3135549652/lens-reviews-explained/8|dead-url=no}}</ref>。

<span>'''DXOMARK传感器总体得分'''</span>是取自下列三个项目的分数<ref name=DxOMark-Cameras/><ref name=DaystarVisions>{{Cite web|url=https://DaystarVisions.com/Docs/Tuts/DxOMark/|title=A simple guide to the DxOMark numbers|website=DaystarVisions.com|publisher=Daystar Visions|date=2015|access-date=13 October 2020|archive-date=2020-08-08|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200808081148/https://daystarvisions.com/Docs/Tuts/DxOMark/|dead-url=no}}</ref>：

* 以[[色彩]]位评测颜色深度的人像分数
* 以[[动态范围]]的文件数评测动态范围的风景分数
* 以[[ISO]]值评测低光性能的运动分数

另一项测试标准是被定义为「[[清晰度]]测量单位」的感知百万像素（P-MPix），用于评估相机与特定[[镜头]]搭配后所呈现的[[分辨率]] <ref name=DxOMark-P-MPix>{{Cite web|url=https://www.DxOMark.com/index.php/Publications/DxOMark-Reviews/Looking-for-new-photo-gear-DxOMark-s-Perceptual-Megapixel-can-help-you|title=DxOMark reviews > looking for new photo gear? DxOMark's Perceptual Megapixel can help you|website=www.DxOMark.com|publisher=[[DxO|DxO Labs]]|date=17 December 2012|access-date=23 August 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130814061539/http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Publications/DxOMark-Reviews/Looking-for-new-photo-gear-DxOMark-s-Perceptual-Megapixel-can-help-you|archive-date=2013-08-14|url-status=dead}}。</ref> DXOMARK认为在评估相机和镜头的图像质量时，对摄影师来说，P-Mpix比其他评测锐度的方式更为准确且更有实质价值<ref name=DxOMark-P-MPix/><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://PetaPixel.com/2012/12/17/perceptual-megapixel-mtf-charts-boiled-down-to-a-single-number/|title=Perceptual Megapixel: lens sharpness boiled down to a single number|website=PetaPixel.com|publisher=[[PetaPixel|PetaPixel blog]]|date=17 December 2012|access-date=13 October 2020|archive-date=2020-11-12|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201112015430/https://petapixel.com/2012/12/17/perceptual-megapixel-mtf-charts-boiled-down-to-a-single-number/|dead-url=no}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://TimGrey.com/blog/2013/dxomark-introduces-the-perceptual-megapixel/|title=DxOMark introduces the 'Perceptual Megapixel'|website=TimGrey.com|publisher=Tim Grey's blog – thoughts on photography, digital imaging, and travel|date=6 January 2013|access-date=23 August 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130827051812/http://timgrey.com/blog/2013/dxomark-introduces-the-perceptual-megapixel/|archive-date=2013-08-27|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.CNET.com/news/dxo-labs-tries-making-sense-of-camera-lens-sharpness/|title=DxO Labs tries making sense of camera lens sharpness|website=www.CNET.com|publisher=[[CNET]] – [[CBS Interactive|CBS Interactive Inc]]|date=17 December 2012|access-date=13 October 2020|archive-date=2020-10-23|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201023011430/https://www.cnet.com/news/dxo-labs-tries-making-sense-of-camera-lens-sharpness/|dead-url=no}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.Photo.net/discuss/threads/dxomark-scores-lens-sharpness-with-perceptual-megapixel.473326/|title=DxOMark scores lens sharpness with Perceptual Megapixel|website=www.Photo.net|publisher=Photo.net Photography forums|date=20 December 2012|access-date=13 October 2020|archive-date=2021-01-27|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210127014439/https://www.photo.net/discuss/threads/dxomark-scores-lens-sharpness-with-perceptual-megapixel.473326/|dead-url=no}}</ref>{{Unreliable source?|sure=y|reason=This is an internet discussion forum|date=2020年10月}}。截至2015年12月，[[佳能]]EOS 5DS R搭配 EF 300mm f / 2.8L IS II USM 镜头所实测的P-MPix最高（45 P-Mpix），其次是[[卡尔·蔡司]] APO Sonnar T * 2/135 ZE（搭配佳能EOS 5DS R为41 P-Mpix，搭配[[尼康]] 800E 则为36 P-Mpix）<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Lenses/Camera-Lens-Ratings/Optical-Metric-Scores |title=存档副本 |access-date=2018-04-12 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130526230825/http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Lenses/Camera-Lens-Ratings/Optical-Metric-Scores |archive-date=2013-05-26 |dead-url=yes }}</ref>。

多年来，DXOMARK的评测资料已用于反应出[[传感器]]图像质量和低光感亮度与价格间的关系，同时也影响到传感器尺寸和分辨率。<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://luminous-landscape.com/dxomark-sensor-for-benchmarking-cameras/|title=DxOMark Sensor For Benchmarking Cameras - Luminous Landscape|accessdate=2015-11-14|archive-date=2015-11-17|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151117025716/https://luminous-landscape.com/dxomark-sensor-for-benchmarking-cameras/|dead-url=no}}</ref>近来，DXOMARK也评估了[[无人机]]相机的图像质量。<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.dxomark.com/Reviews/DxOMark-benchmarks-for-popular-drone-camera-sensors|title=DxOMark benchmarks for popular drone camera sensors {{!}} DxOMark|last=DxO|accessdate=2017-06-15|language=en|archive-date=2017-07-06|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170706070555/https://www.dxomark.com/Reviews/DxOMark-benchmarks-for-popular-drone-camera-sensors|dead-url=no}}</ref>

== 相机镜头评比 ==
DXOMARK的镜头分数也能评比[相机镜头。将镜头搭配各种型号的[[相机]]，以专有的测试工具进行评测 <ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.dxomark.com/Lenses/Ratings|title=Camera Lens Ratings by DxOMark {{!}} DxOMark|accessdate=2015-11-11|archive-date=2015-11-08|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151108010844/http://www.dxomark.com/Lenses/Ratings|dead-url=no}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://daystarvisions.com/Docs/Tuts/DxOMark/|title=A Simple Guide to the DxOMark Numbers – Daystar|accessdate=2015-11-11|archive-date=2016-02-07|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160207045735/http://daystarvisions.com/Docs/Tuts/DxOMark/|dead-url=no}}</ref>。与DXOMARK的[[#相机传感器评比|相机传感器评比]]一样，DXOMARK的镜头得分是也汇整自五项子分数，即：[[清晰度]]、[[失真]]、[[暗角]]、通光量和[[色差]]。

== 手机摄像头评比 ==
随着[[智能手机]]取代了[[傻瓜相机]] <ref>{{Cite web|author=Daisuke Wakabayashi|date=30 July 2013|url=https://www.WSJ.com/news/articles/SB10001424127887324251504578580263719432252|url-access=subscription|title=The point-and-shoot camera faces its existential moment; as more users opt for smartphones, companies wonder what's next|website=www.WSJ.com|publisher=[[The Wall Street Journal]] – Dow Jones & Company, Inc.|access-date=|archive-date=2017-08-30|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170830200119/https://www.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424127887324251504578580263719432252|dead-url=no}}</ref> ，DXOMARK也从2011年起开始测试智能手机和其他移动设备，并于2012年推出DXOMARK Mobile<ref name=DxOMark-WideNight>{{Cite web|url=https://www.DxOMark.com/introducing-our-new-wide-and-night-scores/|title=Introducing our new Wide and Night scores|website=www.DxOMark.com|publisher=DxOMark|date=18 September 2019|access-date=13 October 2020|archive-date=2020-11-11|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201111164456/https://www.dxomark.com/introducing-our-new-wide-and-night-scores/|dead-url=no}}</ref><ref name=AndroidCentral>{{Cite news|url=https://www.AndroidCentral.com/dxomark-revamps-its-mobile-testing-phone-cameras-2017|title=DxOMark revamps its mobile testing for the phone cameras of 2017; new testing method will take into account dual cameras, selfie performance, and other recent trends.|date=12 September 2017|website=www.AndroidCentral.com|publisher=Android Central – [[Future plc|Future US, Inc.]]|access-date=13 October 2020|archive-date=2017-09-12|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170912134539/https://www.androidcentral.com/dxomark-revamps-its-mobile-testing-phone-cameras-2017|dead-url=no}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|author=Lexy Savvides|url=http://www.CNET.com.au/smartphones-outperforming-high-end-compact-cameras-339341960.htm|title=Smartphones outperforming high-end compact cameras|website=www.CNET.com.au|publisher=[[CNET|CNET Australia]] – CBS Interactive.|date=10 October 2012|access-date=15 February 2014|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140224110908/http://www.cnet.com.au/smartphones-outperforming-high-end-compact-cameras-339341960.htm|archive-date=2014-02-24}}</ref>。2017年9月，增加了针对当前[[智能手机]]摄像头（包括双摄像头）的性能评测，像是：夜间摄影、远摄变焦、深度效果和[[散景]] <ref name=DigitalTrends>{{Cite web|url=https://www.DigitalTrends.com/mobile/dxomark-new-smartphone-scale/|title=DxOMark adds bokeh and zoom to new smartphone camera scoring scale; DxOMark's testing protocol for scoring smartphone cameras adds zoom, bokeh|website=www.DigitalTrends.com|publisher=[[Digital Trends]] – Designtechnica Corporation.|date=12 September 2017|access-date=13 October 2020|archive-date=2017-09-12|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170912105707/https://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/dxomark-new-smartphone-scale/|dead-url=no}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.androidcentral.com/dxomark-revamps-its-mobile-testing-phone-cameras-2017|title=DxOMark revamps its mobile testing for the phone cameras of 2017|date=2017-09-12|work=Android Central|accessdate=2017-09-12|archive-date=2017-09-12|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170912134539/https://www.androidcentral.com/dxomark-revamps-its-mobile-testing-phone-cameras-2017|dead-url=no}}</ref>。2019年9月，DXOMARK Mobile正式更名为 DXOMARK CAMERA　<ref name=DxOMark-WideNight/><ref name=PaulMonckton>{{Cite web|last=Monckton|first=Paul|date=24 September 2019|url=https://www.Forbes.com/sites/paulmonckton/2019/09/24/iphone-11s-best-camera-features-now-part-of-dxomark-tests/|title=iPhone 11's best camera features now part of DxOMark tests|website=www.Forbes.com|publisher=[[Forbes]]|access-date=13 October 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201127045435/https://www.forbes.com/sites/paulmonckton/2019/09/24/iphone-11s-best-camera-features-now-part-of-dxomark-tests/|archive-date=2020-11-27|dead-url=no}}</ref>。

每款手机所测试出的DXOMARK摄像头总体得分都是备受瞩目的，该分数是由DXOMARK摄像头照片和DXOMARK摄像头视频这两个类别的得分所组成。

DXOMARK的摄像头照片分数是由11个项目所组成<ref name=PaulMonckton/>：

* 曝光和对比度
* 色彩
* 自动对焦
* 纹理
* 噪点
* 伪像
* 夜间摄影（2019年9月起与闪光灯项目合并）<ref name=DxOMark-WideNight/><ref name=DigitalTrends/><ref name=PaulMonckton/><ref name=GSMArena-WideNight>{{Cite web|url=https://www.GSMArena.com/dxomark_adds_wide_and_night_scores_to_its_tests_note_10_tops_recalculated_results-news-39240.php|title=DxOMark adds Wide and Night scores to its tests, [Samsung Galaxy] Note 10+ tops recalculated results|website=www.GSMArena.com|publisher=[[GSM Arena]]|date=18 September 2019|access-date=13 October 2020|archive-date=2020-11-27|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201127085041/https://www.gsmarena.com/dxomark_adds_wide_and_night_scores_to_its_tests_note_10_tops_recalculated_results-news-39240.php|dead-url=no}}</ref>
* 变焦<ref name=DigitalTrends/>
* 散景<ref name=DigitalTrends/>
* 广角（2019年9月增加）<ref name=DxOMark-WideNight/><ref name=PaulMonckton/><ref name=GSMArena-WideNight/>
* 预览（于2020年10月增加）<ref>{{Cite web|title=DxOMark test shows superiority of Apple's cameras|url=https://www.DigitalInformationWorld.com/2020/10/dxomark-test-shows-superiority-of.html|website=www.DigitalInformationWorld.com|publisher=Digital Information World|date=22 October 2020|access-date=12 November 2020|archive-date=2020-11-02|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201102020758/https://www.digitalinformationworld.com/2020/10/dxomark-test-shows-superiority-of.html|dead-url=no}}</ref>

DXOMARK的摄像头视频分数包括六个与DXOMARK照片分数相同的项目（曝光、色彩、自动对焦、纹理、噪点和伪像），再加上一个防抖项目。

DXOMARK的测试是由该公司的技术人员在各种光照条件下进行，照度范围从1 勒克斯的低光到户外明亮的日光<ref name=DigitalTrends/> 。各项目的分数以专有且机密的组合方式汇整成总体分数。除了变焦和[[散景]]，所有的测试都受限在默认模式下进行，这也让测试者在测试时更为谨慎。

== 自拍摄像头评比 ==
自2019年1月22日起，DXOMARK开始发布新测试项目 — 智能手机前置的「[[自拍]]」摄像头 — 的评测结果<ref name=Monckton-Selfie>{{Cite web|last=Monckton|first=Paul|date=22 January 2019|url=https://www.Forbes.com/sites/paulmonckton/2019/01/22/dxomark-selfie-introduced/|title=How DxOMark's new test ranks selfie cameras|website=www.Forbes.com|publisher=[[Forbes]]|access-date=14 October 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201127083822/https://www.forbes.com/sites/paulmonckton/2019/01/22/dxomark-selfie-introduced/|archive-date=2020-11-27|dead-url=no}}</ref> 。这项全新且独立的DXOMARK Selfie评测是针对照片和视频进行测试，再将两者汇整成DXOMARK Selfie的整体得分<ref name=Monckton-Selfie/>。DXOMARK Selfie的照片子分数包含曝光、色彩、对焦、纹理、噪点、伪像、闪光灯以及[[散景]]。DXOMARK Selfie的视频子分数则有曝光、色彩、对焦、纹理、噪点、伪像与防抖<ref name=Monckton-Selfie/>。

== 智能手机音频评比 ==
DXOMARK于2019年10月推出了全新的智能手机[[音频]]测试准则<ref name=9to5Mac>{{Cite web|last=Lovejoy|first=Ben|date=10 October 2019|url=https://9to5Mac.com/2019/10/10/dxomark-audio-testing/|title=DxOMark audio testing begins, with interesting results for iPhones - finds iPhone 11 Pro Max worse than iPhone XS Max|website=9to5Mac.com|publisher=9to5Mac blog|access-date=14 October 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201127091824/https://9to5mac.com/2019/10/10/dxomark-audio-testing/|archive-date=2020-11-27|dead-url=no}}</ref>。以手机的内置[[扬声器]]评测其播放性能；以手机的内置[[麦克风]]评测其录制性能<ref name=TheNextWeb-Audio>{{Cite web|last=Mehta|first=Ivan|date=10 October 2019|url=https://TheNextWeb.com/plugged/2019/10/10/dxomark-launches-audio-ranking-to-test-recording-and-playback-quality-of-phones/|title=DxOMark launches audio ranking to test recording and playback quality of phones|website=TheNextWeb.com|publisher=Plugged {{!}} [[The Next Web]]|access-date=14 October 2020|archive-date=2020-11-27|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201127090339/https://thenextweb.com/plugged/2019/10/10/dxomark-launches-audio-ranking-to-test-recording-and-playback-quality-of-phones/|dead-url=no}}</ref> 。测试的类别包括<ref name=9to5Mac/><ref name=TheNextWeb-Audio/>

* [[音色]]（频率响应、高音/中音/低音、音调平衡、音量依赖度）
* 力度（起音、低音准确度、冲击力、音量依赖度）
* 空间感（广度、平衡性、距离、定位能力）
* [[音量]]（最大、最小、用户音量一致性）
* 音损（噪声、抽吸效应、失真、用户音损、其他音损）

只测试于录制项目<ref name=9to5Mac/><ref name=TheNextWeb-Audio/>：
* [[背景]]（方向性、噪声分布、音损）

== 智能手机屏幕评比 ==
2020年10月，DXOMARK推出了移动设备显示屏（屏幕）的评测准则。DXOMARK Display测试是以超过400个的测量值、20多个小时的实验室评估和真实场景进行评测。所得的结果包括六项子分数：易读性、色彩、视频、运动，触控以及伪像<ref name=BusinessInsider>{{Cite web|title=DXOMARK introduces new score for smartphone display and expands smartphone rear-camera testing|url=https://Markets.BusinessInsider.com/news/stocks/dxomark-introduces-new-score-for-smartphone-display-and-expands-smartphone-rear-camera-testing-1029707502|website=Markets.BusinessInsider.com|publisher=Markets Insider – Insider Inc. and finanzen.net GmbH|date=21 October 2020|access-date=12 November 2020|archive-date=2020-11-27|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201127094838/https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/dxomark-introduces-new-score-for-smartphone-display-and-expands-smartphone-rear-camera-testing-1029707502|dead-url=no}}</ref>。

== 无线音箱评比 ==
2020年11月，DXOMARK加入了针对无线[[音箱]]进行测试的DXOMARK Speakers 评测准则，而测试内容包括使用声级计与已校正麦克风的实验室客观测试，以及20个小时的感知评估。DXOMARK还结合了专业音乐家和录音室制订出专用的音频片段，包含爵士、嘻哈、古典、流行、摇滚、拉丁、电子和另类风格的音乐<ref>{{Cite web|title=DXOMark announces new benchmark for the sound quality of wireless speakers|url=https://www.TechRadar.com/uk/news/dxomark-announces-new-benchmark-for-the-sound-quality-of-wireless-speakers|website=www.TechRadar.com|publisher=[[TechRadar]] – [[Future Publishing Limited]]|date=4 November 2020|access-date=12 November 2020|archive-date=2020-11-27|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201127081707/https://www.techradar.com/uk/news/dxomark-announces-new-benchmark-for-the-sound-quality-of-wireless-speakers|dead-url=no}}</ref>。

== 比较工具 ==
DXOMARK的网站用户可以选择几款同等级的机种，依网站上公布的测试分数和实际测试数据的图像进行比较<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://daystarvisions.com/Docs/Tuts/DxOMark/|title=A Simple Guide to the DxOMark Numbers – Daystar|accessdate=2016-08-23|archive-date=2016-12-21|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161221001048/http://daystarvisions.com/Docs/Tuts/DxOMark/|dead-url=no}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://Northrup.photo/gear-basics/faq/how-do-i-use-dxomark/|title=How do I use DxOMark?|website=Northrup.photo|publisher=Tony & Chelsea Northrup|date=|access-date=14 October 2020|archive-date=2020-11-27|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201127051800/https://northrup.photo/gear-basics/faq/how-do-i-use-dxomark/|dead-url=no}}</ref>。

== Analyzer ==
Analyzer是DXOMARK推出的一套软件工具，包括测试目标和测试设备。[[相机]]公司、[[新闻媒体]]出版业以及[[网站]] <ref name=PopPhoto>{{Cite web|url=http://www.PopPhoto.com/reviews|title=Popular Photography: how we test|website=www.PopPhoto.com|publisher=[[Popular Photography]] – Bonnier Corporation|date=2 February 2013|access-date=13 November 2020|archive-date=2020-11-09|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201109220253/https://www.popphoto.com/reviews/|dead-url=no}}</ref>都能使用它来测试[[传感器]]、[[镜头]]、相机和手机的摄像头，可以针对[[RAW]]和[[JPEG]]图像以及视频进行测试。Analyzer 也是DXOMARK.com <ref name=PopPhoto/><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.ChassImages.com/minimags2/CI/CIPhotophones/index.html#/4/|title=Publication Partagée|website=www.ChassImages.com|language=fr|publisher=Chasseur d’Images|accessdate=8 November 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304102235/http://www.chassimages.com/minimags2/CI/CIPhotophones/index.html#/4/|archive-date=2016-03-04|url-status=dead}}</ref>幕后的分析工具，分析结果能以数字或图形显示<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.SLRgear.com/articles/howwetest/howwetest.html|title=How we test lenses|publisher=SLR Gear!|website=www.SLRgear.com|date=|accessdate=8 November 2015|archive-date=2018-03-10|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180310010440/http://www.slrgear.com/articles/howwetest/howwetest.html|dead-url=no}}</ref>。Analyzer最初是由DxO Labs推出，现在是DXOMARK的产品；DXOMARK是由[[DxO]]分拆出来的<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://corp.DxOMark.com/analyzer/|title=DxO Analyzer|website=corp.DxOMark.com|publisher=DxOMark|date=|access-date=9 March 2018|archive-date=2018-04-16|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180416003215/https://corp.dxomark.com/analyzer/|dead-url=no}}</ref>。

Analyzer 可用于测试光学、传感器、防抖、视频、快门时序和3D功能的模块<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.PhotographyBlog.com/news/dxo_analyzer_5/|title=DxO Analyzer 5|publisher=Photography Blog|website=www.PhotographyBlog.com|date=|accessdate=11 November 2015|archive-date=2019-10-01|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191001200803/https://www.photographyblog.com/news/dxo_analyzer_5|dead-url=no}}</ref>。

== 行业中的运用 ==
相机和手机发布会上经常会以DXOMARK的评测分数来展现其产品的图像质量性能<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.AndroidCentral.com/htc-10-gets-same-dxomark-score-galaxy-s7|title=HTC 10 gets the same DXOMark score as Galaxy S7|website=www.AndroidCentral.com|publisher=[[Android Central]]|date=12 April 2016|access-date=23 August 2016|archive-date=2016-08-02|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160802112251/http://www.androidcentral.com/htc-10-gets-same-dxomark-score-galaxy-s7|dead-url=no}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://news.Samsung.com/us/2016/03/18/leading-camera-lab-report-samsung-galaxy-s7-edge-named-new-smartphone-camera-champion/|title=Leading camera lab report: Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge named new smartphone camera champion|website=news.Samsung.com|publisher=Samsung Newsroom|date=18 March 2016|access-date=23 August 2016|archive-date=2016-09-14|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160914235009/https://news.samsung.com/us/2016/03/18/leading-camera-lab-report-samsung-galaxy-s7-edge-named-new-smartphone-camera-champion/|dead-url=no}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.CNET.com/news/google-pixel-camera-design-lure-from-iphone/|title=How Google hopes its Pixel camera will win over iPhone fans|website=www.CNET.com|publisher=[[CNET]]|date=|access-date=13 November 2016|archive-date=2016-11-08|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161108123146/https://www.cnet.com/news/google-pixel-camera-design-lure-from-iphone/|dead-url=no}}</ref>。获得DXOMARK Camera的高评分也成为供货商<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.MacWorld.com/article/3127734/ios/8-times-google-savagely-burned-apple-during-the-pixel-announcement.html#slide4|title=8 times Google savagely burned Apple during the Pixel announcement|website=www.MacWorld.com|publisher=[[Mac World]]|date=|access-date=13 November 2016|archive-date=2016-11-14|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161114165534/http://www.macworld.com/article/3127734/ios/8-times-google-savagely-burned-apple-during-the-pixel-announcement.html#slide4|dead-url=no}}</ref>和营销材料<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.VerizonWireless.com/wireless-devices/smartphones/google/|title=Google Pixel 2 and Pixel 2 XL|publisher=[[Verizon Wireless]]|website=www.VerizonWireless.com|date=|access-date=8 March 2018|archive-date=2018-03-08|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180308063647/https://www.verizonwireless.com/wireless-devices/smartphones/google/|dead-url=no}}</ref>的质量保证，不过，要注意的是，这些评分仅反映图像质量。<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://PocketNow.com/2016/10/04/google-pixel-a-great-dxomark-score|title=Google Pixel: a great DxOMark score doesn't mean 'the best smartphone camera'|last=Bagnell|first=Juan Carlos|date=4 October 2016|website=PocketNow.com|publisher=|access-date=13 November 2016|archive-date=2016-11-14|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161114083946/http://pocketnow.com/2016/10/04/google-pixel-a-great-dxomark-score|dead-url=no}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.AndroidPit.com/who-is-hiding-behind-dxomark-scores|title=Who is hiding behind DxOMark scores?|website=www.AndroidPit.com|publisher=Android PIT|date=|access-date=15 June 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170830194840/https://www.androidpit.com/who-is-hiding-behind-dxomark-scores|archive-date=2017-08-30|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://Fortune.com/2017/10/04/google-pixel-2-camera-dxomark-score/|title=Google's new Pixel 2 phone cameras are highly rated|website=Fortune.com|publisher=[[Fortune (magazine)|Fortune]]|date=4 October 2017|access-date=5 October 2017|archive-date=2017-10-05|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171005001846/http://fortune.com/2017/10/04/google-pixel-2-camera-dxomark-score/|dead-url=no}}</ref> DXOMARK同时也提供硬件制造商有关图像质量的咨询服务。<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.AndroidAuthority.com/dxomark-ranking-troublesome-805633/|title=DxOMark scores shouldn't be your definitive camera rating system|date=9 October 2017|website=www.AndroidAuthority.com|publisher=[[Android Authority]]|access-date=10 October 2017|archive-date=2017-10-09|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171009162328/http://www.androidauthority.com/dxomark-ranking-troublesome-805633/|dead-url=no}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://ResourceMagOnline.com/2017/10/a-summary-of-mkbhds-explanation-of-dxomark-ratings/81499/|title=A summary of MKBHD's explanation of DxOMark ratings|website=ResourceMagOnline.com|publisher=Resource|date=October 2017|access-date=17 October 2017|archive-date=2017-10-21|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171021205641/http://resourcemagonline.com/2017/10/a-summary-of-mkbhds-explanation-of-dxomark-ratings/81499/|dead-url=no}}</ref>

== 外部链接 ==
* {{Official website}}
* [https://corp.dxomark.com/analyzer/ DxO分析]{{Wayback|url=https://corp.dxomark.com/analyzer/ |date=20180416003215 }}
* [https://corp.dxomark.com/ DxOMark图像实验室]{{Wayback|url=https://corp.dxomark.com/ |date=20180331071250 }}

[[Category:數位攝影]]
[[Category:攝影器材生產商]]
[[Category:法国软件公司]]

== 参考文獻 ==

DXOMARK - 版本历史

imported>CYCcc：​/* 相机传感器评比 */

imported>CYCcc：/* 相机传感器评比 */