编辑“︁Libs of TikTok”︁（章节）

==接待==
=== 对账户内容的反应 ===
该账户被描述为对教师、医疗提供者和儿童医院进行骚扰和批评。<ref name=":31" /><ref name=":49" /><ref name=":50" /> 它被称为是一个仇恨言论账户。<ref>{{cite web
    | script-title = en:New Human Rights Campaign Foundation Report: Online Hate & Real World Violence Are Inextricably Linked
    | url = https://www.hrc.org/press-releases/new-human-rights-campaign-foundation-report-online-hate-real-world-violence-are-inextricably-linked
    | website = Human Rights Campaign
    | access-date = 7 March 2023
    | archive-date = 2023-09-09
    | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20230909074702/https://www.hrc.org/press-releases/new-human-rights-campaign-foundation-report-online-hate-real-world-violence-are-inextricably-linked
    | dead-url = no
    }}</ref> 它还被描述为通过重新发布LGBT人士、教师、学校和其他机构的视频剪辑，并附带煽动性的框架，传播误导信息和[[错误信息]]。<ref name=":31" /><ref name=":33" /><ref name=":25" /><ref name=":8" /><ref name=":17"/><ref name="shopify ties" /> 尽管Libs of TikTok的粉丝和支持者表示该账户仅是重新发布已公开可获取的性别和性别观念的内容，<ref name=":8" /> "但该账户的粉丝对LGBTQ+极其反感，并经常攻击其分享的个人内容。"<ref name=":27" />

Raichik将Libs of TikTok的视频重发描述为对"疯狂者"的"揭露"。她还描述了对她在线活动的批评是要"取消和沉默"她，并说她收到了死亡威胁。<ref name=":31" />

==== 负面 ====
[[美国公民自由联盟]]的媒体策略师Gillian Branstetter指出，Libs of TikTok“正在为右翼宣传找寻新的人物”，并且“它依赖于来自TikTok和互联网的无尽内容流，将任何一个跨性别人士描绘为他们故事中的新反派。”左倾媒体监察组织{{tsl|en|Media Matters for America||}}的LGBTQ项目主管Ari Drennen认为，“Libs of TikTok基本上充当着更广泛的右翼媒体生态系统的通讯社”，并补充说该帐户已经“以真实的方式影响公共政策，影响教师在课堂上的安全感”。<ref name="wapo" /> 根据Drennen的说法，她在批评Libs of TikTok之后，收到了500多条关于她的性取向和外貌的恶意评论。<ref>{{Cite news
    | date         = 2022-04-22
    | script-title         = en:Libs of TikTok account has resurrected decades-long LGBTQ conspiracies, says writer
    | work         = {{tsl|en|CBC Radio||CBC Radio}}
    | url         = https://www.cbc.ca/radio/day6/libs-of-tiktok-reading-27-000-marvel-comics-russia-s-wagner-group-jake-epstein-s-one-man-show-and-more-1.6427335/libs-of-tiktok-account-has-resurrected-decades-long-lgbtq-conspiracies-says-writer-1.6427362
    | access-date         = 2022-06-13
    | archive-date         = 2023-01-08
    | archive-url         = https://web.archive.org/web/20230108113348/https://www.cbc.ca/radio/day6/libs-of-tiktok-reading-27-000-marvel-comics-russia-s-wagner-group-jake-epstein-s-one-man-show-and-more-1.6427335/libs-of-tiktok-account-has-resurrected-decades-long-lgbtq-conspiracies-says-writer-1.6427362
    | dead-url         = no
    }}</ref> 《Jezebel》的Kylie Cheung认为，「封禁像Libs of TikTok这种让在线攻击可以迅速升级为现实生活中的威胁的恶意帐户是一个重要的步骤。但很明显，我们现在处于一个恐怖的，更广泛的反LGBTQ的时刻，几乎每一个右翼媒体和顶级的共和党人都在推动它。」<ref>{{Cite web
 |last         = Cheung
 |first        = Kylie
 |date         = 2022-08-31
 |script-title = en:Boston Children's Hospital Receives Bomb Threat Amid Far-Right, Anti-Trans Harassment Campaign
 |url          = https://jezebel.com/boston-childrens-hospital-receives-bomb-threat-amid-far-1849478654
 |access-date  = 2022-09-01
 |website      = {{tsl|en|Jezebel (website)||Jezebel}}
 |language     = en-us
 |archive-date = 2023-11-11
 |archive-url  = https://web.archive.org/web/20231111014716/https://jezebel.com/boston-childrens-hospital-receives-bomb-threat-amid-far-1849478654
 |dead-url     = no
}}</ref> 《Them》网站的Reina Sultan认为，“社交媒体平台不仅对限制Libs of TikTok传播仇恨的能力做得不够，而且对保护LGBTQ+人群的努力也不够。”<ref name=":56" /> {{tsl|en|The Forward||The Forward}}的{{tsl|en|Elad Nehorai||Elad Nehorai}}认为Libs of TikTok正在「煽动对跨性别青少年的[[反猶騷亂]]」，并将性侵犯的指控与反犹太人的[[血祭诽谤]]进行比较。<ref name=":34" /> LGBT组织[[GLAAD]]在一份声明中表示，“Libs of TikTok与通过发布谎言、误信息和公然的仇恨恶意攻击LGBTQ组织、人员和盟友同义。”<ref name=":28" />

哈佛大学肖伦斯坦媒体、政治和公共政策中心的研究主任Joan Donovan认为，“我们已经到达社交媒体的这个阶段，人们知道当像Libs of TikTok这样的账户召集另一个账户或个人或机构时该怎么做”，称这些帖子的反应为“网络煽动”，可以产生“雪球效应，你会看到人们变得更加大胆参与”。Donovan也提出，“起初的评论可能并不那么煽动性，但如果这创建了一种可识别的攻击模式，正如Libs of TikTok的账户一样，那么这些公司完全有权利警告然后禁止该账户。”Donovan将Twitter对Libs of TikTok的处理与Twitter未能阻止匿名者Q、[[推翻2020年美国選舉结果的尝试|停止偷窃运动]]和1月6日美国国会大厦袭击之间画了等号，Twitter只在几次与这些运动有关的暴力行为后才开始打压。她也把右翼媒体对Libs of TikTok的推广和导致1月6日国会大厦袭击的在线活动之间画了等号。Donovan指出，“我们看到更多的人觉得，正如他们在起义期间所做的那样，冲击医院可能是他们保卫自己和他们的价值观的唯一选择。”<ref name=":31" /><ref name=":43" /> 哈佛法学院临床导师和跨性别活动家Alejandra Caraballo认为，Twitter没有因其内容而禁止Libs of TikTok，因为"他们不想在[<nowiki/>[[埃隆·马斯克收购推特案]]正在进行的时候在政治上摇摆不定。"<ref name=":23">{{Cite web
 |last         = Giardina
 |first        = Henry
 |date         = 2022-08-15
 |script-title = en:A Children's Hospital Providing Gender-Affirming Care is Being Targeted with Death Threats. Guess Who's Behind It.
 |url          = https://www.intomore.com/the-internet/childrens-hospital-providing-gender-affirming-care-targeted-death-threats-guess-whos-behind/
 |access-date  = 2022-08-16
 |website      = INTO
 |language     = en-US
 |archive-date = 2023-08-07
 |archive-url  = https://web.archive.org/web/20230807091730/https://www.intomore.com/the-internet/childrens-hospital-providing-gender-affirming-care-targeted-death-threats-guess-whos-behind/
 |dead-url     = no
}}</ref>[[耶鲁大学]]儿科学助理教授Meredithe McNamara认为，「允许这种仇恨言论在互联网上滋生并催生直接威胁，将会产生难以恢复的长期伤害。」<ref name=":43" />

==== 积极 ====

当时的[[塔克·卡森今夜秀|塔克·卡尔森今晚]]的主持人Tucker Carlson赞扬了Libs of TikTok，称“美国没有任何新闻机构比Libs of TikTok更揭示美国学校的现实”，并称该账户转发的视频为“愚蠢和令人恶心”。<ref name=":62" /> 小唐纳德·特朗普认为，“Libs of TikTok经常提出的问题——而左派想要忽视的是——“父母是否有权知道他们的孩子在公立学校中被教授什么？”<ref name=":8" />[[班·夏皮羅|Ben Shapiro]] 为Libs of TikTok辩护，称其为“一个仅仅发布左派自毁的Twitter账户。”<ref name=":8" /><u>[[巴比伦蜜蜂]]</u>的Seth Dillon称赞Libs of TikTok的工作为“英勇”和“高风险”。<ref name=":55" /> {{tsl|en|Christina Pushaw||Christina Pushaw}} 自称为“[Libs of TikTok的]使命的坚定支持者。”<ref name=":56" />

=== 对身份揭露的回应 ===
《The Week》的Bonnie Kristian辩称「Libs of TikTok背后的人并不重要，…因为[[阴谋论]]现在已经是共同的」，并补充说「洛伦茨的揭露大部分都没有抓住要点。」<ref>{{Cite web
 |last         = Kristian
 |first        = Bonnie
 |date         = 2022-04-19
 |script-title = en:Out with Alex Jones-style conspiracy theorizing. In with Libs of TikTok.
 |url          = https://theweek.com/conspiracy-theories/1012733/out-with-alex-jones-style-conspiracy-theorizing-in-with-libs-of-tiktok
 |access-date  = April 21, 2022
 |website      = {{tsl|en|The Week||The Week}}
 |language     = en
 |archive-date = 2023-08-18
 |archive-url  = https://web.archive.org/web/20230818022927/https://theweek.com/conspiracy-theories/1012733/out-with-alex-jones-style-conspiracy-theorizing-in-with-libs-of-tiktok
 |dead-url     = no
}}</ref> {{tsl|en|UnHerd|UnHerd|Unherd}}的{{tsl|en|Kat Rosenfield||Kat Rosenfield}}将《华盛顿邮报》的文章称为「一个像疯狂的超级英雄故事的揭露」，「很难知道Libs of TikTok的更大的罪过是什么：是错了，还是太受欢迎了。」<ref>{{Cite web
 |last         = Rosenfield
 |first        = Kat
 |date         = 2022-04-21
 |script-title = en:Why Libs of TikTok terrifies the media
 |url          = https://unherd.com/2022/04/why-libs-of-tiktok-terrifies-the-media/
 |access-date  = April 21, 2022
 |website      = {{tsl|en|UnHerd||UnHerd}}
 |language     = en-GB
 |archive-date = 2023-05-28
 |archive-url  = https://web.archive.org/web/20230528214509/https://unherd.com/2022/04/why-libs-of-tiktok-terrifies-the-media/
 |dead-url     = no
}}</ref>National Review的Dan McLaughlin认为，像Libs of TikTok那样的身份揭露已经“成为主要媒体记者报道可以被描绘为‘极端主义者’的右翼人士的标准做法。”<ref name=":45">{{Cite web
 |last         = McLaughlin
 |first        = Dan
 |date         = 2022-09-07
 |script-title = en:Don't Apply Different Speech Rules to Libs of TikTok
 |url          = https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/09/dont-apply-different-speech-rules-to-libs-of-tiktok/
 |access-date  = 2022-09-08
 |website      = [[國家評論|National Review]]
 |archive-date = 2023-02-13
 |archive-url  = https://web.archive.org/web/20230213090133/https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/09/dont-apply-different-speech-rules-to-libs-of-tiktok/
 |dead-url     = no
}}</ref>

Hofstra University的教授和前[[贝拉克·奥巴马|奥巴马政府]]工作人员Kara Alaimo在为NBC News撰写的文章中，对于揭露运营该账户的个人身份的批评予以驳斥，她认为“这里需要保护的人是那些仅仅因为他们的身份而被仇恨目标的人——而不是像Raichik那样发动攻击的人。"<ref name=alai>{{cite web
 |url          = https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/doxxing-libs-tiktok-creator-justified-rcna25280
 |script-title = en:There's a proper term for what happened to the "Libs of TikTok" creator. It's not 'doxxing.'
 |website      = [[NBC新聞|NBC News]]
 |date         = 2022-04-21
 |first        = Kara
 |last         = Alaimo
 |access-date  = 2023-07-13
 |archive-date = 2023-05-29
 |archive-url  = https://web.archive.org/web/20230529084716/https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/doxxing-libs-tiktok-creator-justified-rcna25280
 |dead-url     = no
}}</ref>

关于Raichik身份的揭露，[[大西洋 (雜誌)|大西洋]]的Kaitlyn Tiffany认为"这个词[''doxxing'']曾经定义了一个类别，现在它表达的是一种情绪。任何感觉被doxxed的人都会声称自己被doxxed。"<ref name="atlantic">{{Cite web
 |last         = Tiffany
 |first        = Kaitlyn
 |date         = 2022-04-22
 |script-title = en:'Doxxing' Means Whatever You Want It To
 |url          = https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2022/04/doxxing-meaning-libs-of-tiktok/629643/
 |access-date  = April 24, 2022
 |website      = [[大西洋 (雜誌)|The Atlantic]]
 |language     = en
 |archive-date = 2022-04-24
 |archive-url  = https://web.archive.org/web/20220424064731/https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2022/04/doxxing-meaning-libs-of-tiktok/629643/
 |dead-url     = no
}}</ref>

评论员和阴谋论者{{tsl|en|Jack Posobiec||Jack Posobiec}}在推特上写道："这不是新闻。这是由亿万富翁控制的[[杰夫·贝索斯|Bezos]]邮报对TikTok Libs进行的doxxing和抹黑。"<ref name=":8" />

监察组织{{tsl|en|StopAntisemitism.org||StopAntisemitism.org}}和{{tsl|en|Jewcy||Jewcy}}杂志编辑Isaac de Castro等犹太批评家认为Lorenz提及Raichik的Orthodox Judaism是不必要的，且有助于推动antisemitism。<ref name=":8" /> ''{{tsl|en|The Jewish Week||The Jewish Week}}''的主编{{tsl|en|Andrew Silow-Carroll||Andrew Silow-Carroll}}在《[[以色列时报]]》的一篇博客中为Raichik的宗教信仰的提及辩护，认为这「揭示了信仰与右翼政治之间日益紧密的联系」。<ref>{{Cite web
 |last         = Silow-Carroll
 |first        = Andrew
 |date         = 2022-04-25
 |script-title = en:Why the "Libs of TikTok" founder's Jewish identity was fair game
 |url          = https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/why-the-libs-of-tiktok-founders-jewish-identity-was-fair-game/
 |access-date  = April 26, 2022
 |website      = [[以色列时报|The Times of Israel]]
 |language     = en-US
 |archive-date = 2023-11-05
 |archive-url  = https://web.archive.org/web/20231105065608/https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/why-the-libs-of-tiktok-founders-jewish-identity-was-fair-game/
 |dead-url     = no
}}</ref>

=== 其他反应 ===
2022年4月，另一名名叫Chaya Raichik的Orthodox Jew，一位在洛杉矶长大的[[家庭主婦|全职妈妈]]，因为人们将她误认为是TikTok Libs背后的人，而收到了数百条负面信息。<ref name=":3">{{Cite web
 |last         = Keene
 |first        = Louis
 |date         = 2022-04-21
 |script-title = en:Mistaken for a right-wing media star, she met a cyberbullying mob
 |url          = https://forward.com/news/500292/online-mob-cyberbullying-wrong-chaya-raichik-libs-of-tiktok/
 |access-date  = April 21, 2022
 |website      = {{tsl|en|The Forward||The Forward}}
 |language     = en
 |archive-date = 2023-07-29
 |archive-url  = https://web.archive.org/web/20230729214024/https://forward.com/news/500292/online-mob-cyberbullying-wrong-chaya-raichik-libs-of-tiktok/
 |dead-url     = no
}}</ref>同样在4月，[[YouTuber]] [[蒂姆·浦爾|Tim Pool]]和''{{tsl|en|The Daily Wire||The Daily Wire}}''的[[首席执行官|CEO]] {{tsl|en|Jeremy Boreing||Jeremy Boreing}}在[[時報廣場|时代广场]]购买了一块广告牌，指责洛伦茨对TikTok Libs进行了doxxing。作为回应，洛伦茨称这个广告牌「太愚蠢，简直可笑」。<ref>{{Cite web
 |last         = Allsop
 |first        = Jon
 |date         = 2022-04-27
 |script-title = en:Piers Morgan, Donald Trump, and the doomed transatlantic culture wars
 |url          = https://www.cjr.org/the_media_today/morgan_trump_interview_talktv.php
 |access-date  = 2022-04-28
 |website      = {{tsl|en|Columbia Journalism Review||Columbia Journalism Review}}
 |language     = en
 |archive-date = 2022-04-28
 |archive-url  = https://web.archive.org/web/20220428045912/https://www.cjr.org/the_media_today/morgan_trump_interview_talktv.php
 |dead-url     = no
}}</ref>