编辑“︁Plone”︁（章节）

==优点和缺点==
Plone相比比其他流行的内容管理系统享有良好的安全记录。<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/search-results?query=plone&search_type=all&cves=on |title=National Vulnerability Database, 2008-09-20, 9 records for Plone, 145 Drupal, 259 Joomla!, 149 WordPress; none of the Plone vulnerabilities were rated severe. |accessdate=2012-07-14 |archive-date=2016-03-04 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304025625/https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/search-results?query=plone&search_type=all&cves=on |dead-url=no }}</ref>此安全记录已导致了Plone被广泛采用。

=== 注重安全 ===

Plone被评为最安全的内容管理系统，根据Mitres CVE's CVE's via Mitre直到2012-12-01:
{| class="wikitable"
|-
! !! CVE漏洞数量
|-
! 技术  !! 到目前为止（2012-12-01）
|-
| Plone || 21 <ref>{{Cite web |url=http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=plone |title=存档副本 |accessdate=2012-11-14 |archive-date=2017-11-04 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171104124256/http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=plone |dead-url=no }}</ref>
|-
| Wordpress || 345 <ref>{{Cite web |url=http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=wordpress |title=存档副本 |accessdate=2012-11-14 |archive-date=2017-06-06 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170606013802/http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=wordpress |dead-url=no }}</ref>
|-
| Drupal || 544 <ref>{{Cite web |url=http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=drupal |title=存档副本 |accessdate=2012-11-14 |archive-date=2014-09-14 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140914210149/http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=drupal |dead-url=no }}</ref>
|-
| Joomla || 620 <ref>{{Cite web |url=http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=joomla |title=存档副本 |accessdate=2012-11-14 |archive-date=2017-11-04 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171104124135/http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=Joomla |dead-url=no }}</ref>
|}