编辑“︁Libs of TikTok”︁（章节）

== 账户停用 ==

=== Twitter ===
Twitter已经五次暂时停用了Libs of TikTok的账户，<ref name="wapo" /><ref name=":40" /><ref name=":55" /><ref name="nbc-far-right-influencer" /><ref name="alai" />包括因为基于少数族群地位推广"针对他人的暴力、威胁或骚扰"<ref name=":20" />以及因为"令人厌恶的行为"。<ref name=":41">{{Cite web
 |last         = D'Ambrosio
 |first        = Amanda
 |date         = 2022-08-30
 |script-title = en:Children's National Latest Target of Transgender Care Attacks
 |url          = https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/features/100467
 |access-date  = 2022-08-30
 |website      = {{tsl|en|MedPage Today||MedPage Today}}
 |language     = en
 |archive-date = 2023-06-07
 |archive-url  = https://web.archive.org/web/20230607212410/https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/features/100467
 |dead-url     = no
}}</ref>至少有两次停用源于Raichik在推文中错误地识别性别。<ref name=":43" />

在2022年9月25日，<ref name=":57">{{Cite web
 |last         = Jarrell
 |first        = Zachary
 |date         = 2022-09-30
 |script-title = en:Anti-LGBTQ+ Libs of TikTok hit with [another] 7 day suspension
 |url          = https://www.losangelesblade.com/2022/09/29/anti-lgbtq-libs-of-tiktok-hit-with-another-7-day-suspension/
 |access-date  = 2022-09-30
 |website      = Los Angeles Blade
 |language     = en-US
 |archive-date = 2023-02-13
 |archive-url  = https://web.archive.org/web/20230213092734/https://www.losangelesblade.com/2022/09/29/anti-lgbtq-libs-of-tiktok-hit-with-another-7-day-suspension/
 |dead-url     = no
}}</ref>Libs of TikTok收到了Twitter的一周暂停通知，并声称Twitter没有说明暂停的原因。然而，“The Babylon Bee”的CEO Seth Dillon表示，Libs of TikTok因为"令人厌恶的行为"被停用，而"没有具体的推文被标记"。<ref name=":55" />作为对暂停的回应，Libs of TikTok雇佣了一个法律事务所，发函威胁如果Twitter决定永久停用Libs of TikTok的话，将对Twitter采取法律行动。<ref name=":55" />Libs of TikTok还创建了一个法律防御基金，并鼓励她的支持者向基金捐款。<ref name=":55" />Libs of TikTok表示，封禁账号是“左翼对我进行封杀的针对性骚扰活动的结果”。<ref name=":55" />

Twitter上的LGBT倡导者已经呼吁Twitter永久封禁Libs of TikTok，<ref name=":57" /> 以及几位评论员注意到，Twitter并未对该账号施加永久性的禁令。根据[[全国公共广播电台|NPR]]，"Libs of TikTok似乎通过接近平台规则的边缘但不违反它们来避免直接的禁令"，并补充说该账号"并未明确鼓励关注者威胁任何人，通常使用目标自己的话，有时[[語境去除|断章取义]]地暗示不当行为。"<ref name=":31" /> 根据{{link-en
    | 1 = 哈佛肖伦斯坦媒体、政治和公共政策中心
    | 2 = Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy
}}的研究主任Joan Donovan，Raichik通过在平台采取行动之前删除有问题的推文来躲避禁令，这是Donovan称为传播虚假信息的数字行为者常用的策略。<ref name=":43" />

从大约2022年8月到10月，Libs of TikTok成为Twitter内部重要的讨论对象，一些员工认为该账号应该因为有可能煽动暴力而被永久封禁。<ref name=":43" /> 在[[埃隆·马斯克|Elon Musk]]于2022年10月收购Twitter并成为其CEO后，该网站的审核活动大幅减少。12月9日，记者[[巴里·维斯]]在对前Musk时代被称为Twitter Files的内部Twitter通信的分析中透露，Twitter曾通过[[秘密屏蔽]]来限制Libs of TikTok的影响力，除了已知的暂停外。Musk后来表示，网站的内容指南历史上针对表达右翼观点的账户进行了执行，而对表达左翼观点的账户则忽视了。<ref>{{Cite web
 |date         = 2022-12-09
 |script-title = en:Twitter had "secret blacklists" to limit users, journalist claims
 |url          = https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2022/12/9/twitter-had-secret-blacklists-to-limit-users-journalist-claims
 |access-date  = 2022-12-09
 |website      = Al Jazeera
 |language     = en-GB
 |archive-date = 2022-12-16
 |archive-url  = https://web.archive.org/web/20221216130046/https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2022/12/9/twitter-had-secret-blacklists-to-limit-users-journalist-claims
 |dead-url     = no
}}</ref> 相反，Slate的Evan Urquhart辩称Weiss的发布显示Libs of TikTok得到了优待，指示版主不采取任何行动反对该账号，而是将问题升级到更高级别的管理层。Urquhart进一步辩称，Weiss对Libs of TikTok的描绘危险地将保守派观点与随机恐怖主义和极端主义混为一谈。<ref>{{cite web
 |url          = https://slate.com/technology/2022/12/twitter-files-bari-weiss-libsoftik-elon-musk.html
 |script-title = en:The Anti-Trans Hate Account That Bari Weiss Says Is Yet Another Right-Wing Voice Censored by Twitter
 |date         = 2022-12-09
 |work         = Slate
 |first        = Evan
 |last         = Urquhart
 |access-date  = 2023-07-13
 |archive-date = 2022-12-12
 |archive-url  = https://web.archive.org/web/20221212231400/https://slate.com/technology/2022/12/twitter-files-bari-weiss-libsoftik-elon-musk.html
 |dead-url     = no
}}</ref>

=== 其他平台 ===
Libs of TikTok在TikTok本身也有一个账号，但因违反TikTok社区指南而在2022年3月被暂停。<ref name="wapo" /><ref name=":43" /> Libs of TikTok的[[Instagram]]账户在两个月后的几个小时内被暂停，[[Meta Platforms|Meta]]的一位发言人表示这是由于"对多个版权投诉"的自动系统反应。<ref name=":22" /> 是年9月，Libs of TikTok的Facebook账号因违反平台的社区指南而被永久停用。<ref name=":27" /><ref>{{Cite news
 |last         = McDougall
 |first        = AJ
 |date         = 2022-08-18
 |script-title = en:Libs of TikTok Says It's Banned From Facebook After Boosting Trans Health Misinfo
 |work         = [[每日野獸|The Daily Beast]]
 |url          = https://www.thedailybeast.com/libs-of-tiktok-says-it-is-banned-from-facebook-after-misinfo-on-boston-children-hospitals-trans-care-program
 |access-date  = 21 August 2022
 |archive-date = 2023-11-11
 |archive-url  = https://web.archive.org/web/20231111184321/https://www.thedailybeast.com/libs-of-tiktok-says-it-is-banned-from-facebook-after-misinfo-on-boston-children-hospitals-trans-care-program
 |dead-url     = no
}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web
 |last         = Billson
 |first        = Chantelle
 |date         = 2022-09-23
 |script-title = en:Children's hospital targeted after Libs of TikTok spreads anti-trans "misinformation"
 |url          = https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2022/09/23/akron-children-hospital-ohio-trans-healthcare-libs-of-tiktok/
 |access-date  = 2022-09-24
 |website      = PinkNews
 |language     = en-GB
 |archive-date = 2022-11-21
 |archive-url  = https://web.archive.org/web/20221121185252/https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2022/09/23/akron-children-hospital-ohio-trans-healthcare-libs-of-tiktok/
 |dead-url     = no
}}</ref> Facebook表示这是一个错误的停用<ref name=":31" /> 而该账号在不到一天的时间内就被恢复，<ref name=":27" /><ref>{{Cite news
 |last         = McDougall
 |first        = AJ
 |date         = 2022-08-19
 |script-title = en:Facebook Reverses Libs of TikTok's Suspension After Less Than a Day: Report
 |work         = [[每日野獸|The Daily Beast]]
 |url          = https://www.thedailybeast.com/facebook-reverses-libs-of-tiktok-pages-suspension-after-less-than-a-day-report-says
 |access-date  = 21 August 2022
 |archive-date = 2023-02-13
 |archive-url  = https://web.archive.org/web/20230213093101/https://www.thedailybeast.com/facebook-reverses-libs-of-tiktok-pages-suspension-after-less-than-a-day-report-says
 |dead-url     = no
}}</ref> 这一行动遭到了LGBT组织[[GLAAD]]的批评。<ref name=":28" /> 激进分子在电子商务平台[[Shopify]]上对Libs of TikTok的商店进行了抵制，声称其违反了该平台的[[可接受使用策略|acceptable use policy]]，该政策禁止令人反感的内容和可能导致骚扰和威胁的商品和服务。在一份声明中，Shopify为Libs of TikTok辩护，称“我们接待各种各样和大小的商家，以及各种世界观”。<ref name=":43" />