编辑“︁詭辯”︁（章节）

==诡辩术与辩证法的区分==
{{see also|辩证法}}
诡辩术(Sophistry)与[[辩证法]](Dialectics)有相似和不同之处<ref name=RongqingDai>{{cite web|title=Rongqing Dai， How to Distinguish Dialectics from Sophistry?  November 2019 Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 2(2):1，|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337632025_How_to_Distinguish_Dialectics_from_Sophistry }}</ref>：
* 相似处：[[辩证法]]<ref name=SEP_HegelDialectics>{{cite web
|title=Maybee, Julie E., "Hegel’s Dialectics", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2020 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.)
|URL=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2020/entries/hegel-dialectics
|access-date=2021-06-29
|archive-date=2021-06-28
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210628110622/https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2020/entries/hegel-dialectics/
}}</ref>，针对已经给出的论证，从普遍接受前提出发的，推理出与已给定论的矛盾。诡辩术也是如此<ref name=SEP_Refutation>{{cite web |title= Taylor, C.C.W. and Mi-Kyoung Lee, "The Sophists", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2020 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), |URL= https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/sophists |access-date= 2021-06-29 |archive-date= 2021-11-06 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20211106051319/https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/sophists/ }}</ref>。
* 不同之处：诡辩术在主观方面以欺骗为目的<ref name=SEP_Sophists>{{cite web |title= Taylor, C.C.W. and Mi-Kyoung Lee, "The Sophists", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2020 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), |URL= https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/sophists |access-date= 2021-06-29 |archive-date= 2021-11-06 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20211106051319/https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/sophists/ |dead-url= no }}</ref>，客观上在论证中故意引入违背逻辑的谬论（Fallacy），做出有欺骗性的似是而非的推理和论证。 而辩证法主观方面没有以欺骗为目的，客观上尽力避免违背逻辑的谬论（Fallacy）。

将诡辩装扮成[[辩证法]]的情况,在生活中无处不在, 以至于有时有关社区会觉得这些诡辩是[[辩证法]]<ref name=SEP_Sophists/>。 人们公正和正义感因此被侵蚀， 没有意识到这种做法带来的负面影响
<ref name=RongqingDai_metaphysics>{{cite web |title=Rongqing Dai，  A Very Brief Review of the History of Metaphysics, February 15, 2020, Philosophy World of Ron Dai |url=https://murongqingcao.wordpress.com/2020/02/15/a-very-brief-review-of-the-history-of-metaphysics |access-date=2021-06-29 |archive-date=2021-06-30 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210630080027/https://murongqingcao.wordpress.com/2020/02/15/a-very-brief-review-of-the-history-of-metaphysics/ }}</ref>。